Daily Kos

Tag: Fouad Ajami

The Case FOR fighting in Iraq

Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:14:12 PM PDT

Now look. We all know why we shouldn’t be fighting in Iraq. That’s discussed here every day. But what about the other side of the argument? Doesn’t that get a hearing, here?

That’s why I’m highlighting this article by Professor Fouad Ajami, entitled  "Why We Went To Iraq."
Ajami is a longtime supporter of the war, for whatever reasons are available to him at the moment. Here is his concise explanation for "Why We Fight."

(continued)

The War of One Thousand and One Lies

Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 10:15:26 AM PDT

Hades! OK! Only Nine Hundred and Thirty-Five Lies, but that's close enough to One Thousand and One for me!
http://www.publicintegrity.org/...

Fouad Ajami and the Forces of Darkness

Thu Sep 13, 2007 at 10:36:55 PM PDT

If we hadn't learned enough from the president's speech tonight about the world view of the warmongers in this country, Fouad Ajami appeared to fill in the remaining gaps on tonight's Charlie Rose Show.  What the Bush speech finally got out into the open is that he never really had a plan to leave Iraq, and nothing that has happened since the invasion he sponsored has dissuaded him from pursuing his original plan.  No number of U.S. dead and wounded, no untolled billions of dollars badly needed at home, no death and destruction for innocent Iraqis has given him a shred of doubt.  If this speech was not enough to convince Americans of sound mind that the man should some time ago have been impeached and tried as a war criminal, nothing will.

Hardball: Shuster on FIRE!

Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 02:20:28 PM PDT

David Shuster is guest hosting Hardball today and just took down Fouad Ajami of the notorious Wall Street Journal Op-Ed comparing Scooter Libby to a fallen soldier.

Ajami -- Discourse Analysis 101

Sun Jun 10, 2007 at 06:55:29 PM PDT

The posts on this site responding to Fouad Ajami’s recent editorial have been quite strong, but have nevertheless overlooked the truly frightening implications of his argument -- implications that can be discerned if one employs the tools of 'critical discourse analysis' (CDA).  This form of analysis is designed to uncover the subtle, yet powerful, ideological messages of everyday speech -— messages that can powerfully shape our worldviews, even when we are not consciously aware that we are taking such messages in.  As linguist Robert B. Kaplan has argued (not to be confused with Robert D. Kaplan), "any text is layered, like a sheet of thick plywood consisting of many thin sheets lying at different angles to each other."  Because of this "layered-ness" of texts, certain encoded messages are not always readily —- or consciously -— apparent to their readers, but these messages can nevertheless come to be unconsciously incorporated into a readers’ worldview.  

Keep reading to see how the methods of CDA can help expose the hidden -- and deeply disturbing -- layers of Ajami's piece.  

         

A Soldier’s view on Libby (Live From War VIII)

Sun Jun 10, 2007 at 05:46:36 PM PDT

I am an American Soldier.
I am a Warrior and a member of a team.
I serve the people of the United States, and live the Army Values.
I will always place the mission first.
I will never accept defeat.
I will never quit.
I will never leave a fallen comrade.
I am disciplined, physically and mentally tough,
Trained and proficient in my warrior tasks and drills.
I always maintain my arms, my equipment and myself.
I am an expert and I am a professional.
I stand ready to deploy, engage, and destroy, the enemies of the United States of America in close combat.
I am a guardian of freedom and the American way of life.
I am an American Soldier.

Perhaps before Fouad Ajami likens Scooter Libby to an American Soldier, he should actually review the Soldiers Creed.

The Libby Letters: Fouad Ajami

Sun Jun 10, 2007 at 03:28:11 PM PDT

Johns Hopkins SAIS professor Fouad Ajami beats me to the mocking punch by upping the hysterics ante on his letter to Judge Reggie Walton with his monumentally stupid and insensitive op-ed comparing Libby to a "fallen soldier." In it, Ajami makes a point -- or more precisely, a "point" -- of insisting that "The Soldier's Creed" mandates that one "never leave a fallen comrade."

Of course, the creed itself, by some readings, would appear to require Libby to suck it up and take his punishment like a man. The "mission," after all, has been accomplished. It was, as Patrick Fitzgerald put it, to throw sand in the umpire's face. That Scooter was cut down in the course of the mission is not a matter of honor to Ajami and his letter writing comrades, but more akin to grounds for some sort of a lawsuit, or perhaps a sternly-worded journal article admonishing the enemy bullets for their intellectual inconstancy and lack of dedication to the flowering of democracy worldwide.

But then, neither Libby nor the person to whom Ajami addressed his second screed -- George W. Bush himself -- are or ever were actually soldiers, much less fallen ones, though I certainly don't want to minimize the fact that it was the President himself who personally absorbed the first attacks of the forces of Global Pretzelamofascism.

All in all, though, Ajami's letter is another syrupy dispatch that just doesn't provide much of note, though it does: twice invoke 9/11; refer to the "sheer joy" of "shar[ing] with him the inner workings of Wahhabist creed in Arabia" (creeds are big with Ajami, I guess), and; reveal what really wins a professor's heart, i.e., "read[ing] everything I sent him."

Like most of the letters, Ajami's seeks to elevate the mundane to near-saintliness. Scooter Libby, he tells us:

  • never put on airs;
  • checked in from campaign stops in Wisconsin and Ohio, and;
  • worked evenings and weekends.

Therefore, obviously... something.

But lest you be left with the impression that Ajami's letter contained absolutely nothing remarkable he does remind us of Libby's talents as a novelist (a vocation he could presumably find more time for in prison), describing as "spectacular" the work that became most famed for its passages depicting the fucking of:

  • caged, prostitute-training, pedophile bears, and;
  • dead, but still warm deer.

Yeah. "Spectacular!"

So that's something.

Can't wait to see what prison time inspires.

As a Soldier, Fouad Ajami Sickens Me

Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 02:55:12 PM PDT

       In yesterday’s Wall Street Journal, Dr. Fouad Ajami, a neo-con and Johns Hopkins faculty member, begged for leniency concerning Scooter Libby’s upcoming stint in the slammer for treason obstruction of justice.  In the article, Ajami likened Libby to a "fallen soldier."

Scooter Libby As "A Fallen Soldier"

Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 12:31:56 PM PDT

Since Scooter Libby, the convicted felon, was sentenced to 30 months in prison last week for perjury and obstruction of justice, his pals have come out of the woodwork to make the case for him to be pardoned by George Bush.  But none reach the level of outright offensive garbage as  the op-ed by Fouad Ajami, featured in yesterday's Wall Street Journal, called:

Fallen Soldier

Mr. President, do not leave this man behind

Can there be a grosser insult to the men and women who have given their lives in the service of their country?  Says Mr. Ajami:

In "The Soldier's Creed," there is a particularly compelling principle: "I will never leave a fallen comrade." This is a cherished belief, and it has been so since soldiers and chroniclers and philosophers thought about wars and great, common endeavors...Scooter Libby was there for the beginning of that campaign. He can't be left behind as a casualty of a war our country had once proudly claimed as its own.

I won't even bother to debunk the lies that Mr. Ajami spewed to make his case.  That this man equates what Scooter Libby is going through to thousands of dead U.S. troops says it all.

 

Your Think Tank's war

Fri Oct 13, 2006 at 11:36:51 PM PDT

Laura Rozen has a rather remarkable post about the genesis of the Iraq War, which has gotten virtually no attention. That's all the more surprising because she's discussing allegations made in Bob Woodward's new book, which people have been pawing over frantically for inside information about how and why the White House has failed in Iraq.

Doctrinairism, Arrogance, Myopia, Incompetence, Corruption = The Iraq Fiasco

Sat Sep 02, 2006 at 01:48:27 PM PDT

From "Mindless in Iraq," by Peter W. Galbraith in The New York Review of Books, a set of reviews of Iraq-related current affairs titles.

As we now know, Donald Rumsfeld's Pentagon had no plan to secure any part of Baghdad. It allowed looters to destroy Iraq's governmental infrastructure and to steal thousands of tons of high explosives, weapons, and radioactive materials. And it had no coherent plan for Iraq's postwar governance.


::

Advertise on the Liberal Blog Advertising Network.

Hate ads? Subscribe.






Support Bloggers' Rights!
Support Bloggers' Rights!


On Mothertalkers:

Does Your School Have a Dress Code?

"Eternal is the right frame of mind for making food for a family"

Mothers Behind Bars -- With Their Babies?

Hump Day Open Thread

Over 100 College Presidents call for Alcohol Age to be Reconsidered.

On Street Prophets:

John McCain Whispers Sweet Nothings To Apocalypticists

Wednesday Substitute Coffee Hour!

News from the 'Net

The Prayer Closet, a daily prayer request thread

Oh No! We need Coffee! Coffee Hour/Open Thread